The U.S.S.R. was, until recently, the world’s largest country. Maybe it was too big to endure, but the speed at which it fell apart, once it started, surprised most everybody.
Could the U.S. suffer a similar fate soon? Probably not any time soon, but I believe there is a chance, a very good chance, that it will happen sometime in the 21st century.
A very large chunk of America fell off for a time, starting in 1861, and it took the Civil War, and the defeat of the Confederacy, to put the two pieces back together again. Two main factors caused the Southern secession: slavery and states rights. The former no longer exists, and the latter is no longer a bone of contention, so if we break up any time within the next hundred years or so, it will almost certainly be from some other cause, or causes.
That cause is shaping up to be race. No other country on earth has so many diverse racial and ethnic groups either coming into it, or already in it. This is bound to weaken the cohesion of the nation. The congressmen (mostly white) who passed the laws allowing the non-white immigrants to flood in thought they wanted to share our “good life” and our “values.” They are right about the first but not so right about the second.
Our values are tied up with our history. All colored immigrants consider the U.S. a good place to make money, but as far as embracing our values, meaning Caucasian values, they are not jumping for joy at this prospect. Rather, they are continually complaining that our schools are far too slanted toward white studies, and not paying anywhere near enough attention to non-white studies. Asians want more Asian history, Mexicans want more Mexican history, negroes want more black history, and so on. They feel no particular kinship toward white history.
As far as the other “virtues” supposedly in great supply here in the U.S., things like “liberty,” “freedom” and “democracy,” they mean different things to different people. No doubt they serve as dandy slogans for use by the colored elements for promoting their own interests, but as far as being of any use for uniting disparate peoples, they are proving to be weak reeds.
In speculating as to whether the U.S. might come apart as a nation, we need to first ask ourselves just what a nation is. The dictionary describes it in terms of people sharing a distinctive culture, territory, economy and language, united under a central government. Right off, we see that Americans of today only partly fit this definition. They do share a common territory and economy, and to a great extent a language, but not a distinctive culture. Washington desperately wants everyone to learn English (without making them), and while most still do, it appears that other languages are slowly expanding their footholds. And as far as being united under a central government, all that can be said for sure is that Americans are under a central government.
Francis Parker Yockey said that “the nation is an Idea,” and that the Idea is incapable of being expressed in words. Under this definition we see that the U.S. is becoming less and less a nation every day.
If you are a white person, open your eyes and look around. You see the population getting darker all the time, and you may know that your own race is declining all the time, percentagewise. Does this arouse feelings of warmth and kindship within your blood, or feelings of aversion and withdrawal? As Yockey said, you probably could not express in words just what the Idea of our nation should be, but whatever it is, what you see coming into existence in the U.S. today sure as hell isn’t it.
Man is a territorial animal. Whenever Mexicans create a “Little Mexico” somewhere in the U.S., they want to at least keep, and probably expand, this territory, even though they might not want to admit it. Asians and blacks feel the same way about each “Little Asia” and “Little Africa” they create, even if they might not want to admit it. These territories are popping up all over. America is becoming a mosaic of races and cultures, rather than a more unified nation. (The white man is more or less ignoring his own territorial instincts right now, as he is too brainwashed.) All these colored territories come into being at the expense of the white territory.
Unless there is a change in the birth rates and the rate of immigration, America is projected to become a predominantly colored nation sometime in the 21st century, probably around the middle of it. And how are whites reacting to this projection? Many appear to be ignorant of it or unconcerned, but some are moving, or talking of moving, to the Pacific Northwest. Others are eyeing various other states with low percentages of non-whites. And still others – mostly Southerners – are talking about something like a “New Dixie” or “Greater Dixie,” in the deep South, maybe somewhat along the borders of the Old Confederacy, as a future bastion for the white race. But most whites are staying put, and not even thinking about moving to another state or section of the U.S.
During the War Between the States, a white government in the North defeated a white government in the South which had much smaller manpower and resources, but in the coming conflict (if there is one) we should not expect the Washington government to be unified, racially. In two or three generations it is likely to be heavily laced with non-whites of every stripe. And the military high command may be the same way, with all the generals and admirals subject to deep race-feelings for their own kind. We would thus have a psychologically divided command. When commanders are ordered to do such-and-such, they do not always obey. What did Julius Caesar do when ordered not to cross the Rubicon?
Unless there is a surprising turn-around, the Moscow government seems committed to letting the secession-minded republics go their own way, with maybe only some loose economic and defense ties. Washington, too, might someday consider a heavily polarized U.S. ungovernable, or at least not worth the bloodshed that it might take to bring everybody back in line.
However, there might be plenty of bloodshed here anyway among squabbling factions as they dispute various states or territories or boundaries. If a breakup occurs in the next thirty or forty years the Mexicans may want California, Texas, Arizona and New Mexico; if it doesn’t occur for eighty or ninety years they may want a lot of other states besides. But the Asians are a fast growing segment of the population too, and might fight hard for some of the same states, especially California. Then there are the (non-Mexican) Hispanics, Puerto Ricans, Philippinoes, Indians (from India), American Indians, blacks and, of course – whites. America is getting to be such a mixed bag racially that there’s no telling who might try to stake out a future claim to what. The U.S.S.R. is breaking up along the lines everybody more or less expected, and (so far) without much bloodshed, but in the U.S. we really don’t know what to expect.
If we integrate and hold together as a nation we can expect white Americans to eventually disappear, being both mongrelized and squeezed out of existence, since our present birth-rates are not keeping up with our death-rates. But if America does break apart, I would like to see whites hang on to as much territory as they can. One encouraging sign is that some are looking around and rubbing their eyes in amazement at what is going on; and, ever so slowly, are starting to get their backs up. Any breakup, if it comes, is probably decades away, but – who knows? Until Gorbachev came along, a breakup of the U.S.S.R. seemed kind of far fetched, too. A lot can (and did) happen in five or six years.
Although many whites are alarmed at the fact that America has become a dumping ground for millions of racial aliens, we do not know how they feel about the possibility of the nation eventually splitting up over the presence of these aliens. This is a subject that is not discussed in the news media. No doubt many whites are willing to fight, if need be, to keep from giving up any territory, but they, as yet, have no leaders who have been able to gain national stature.
Caucasian Americans, though, may not be able to hold on to even Rhode Island, unless they get their thinking straightened out. They are too prone to get hung up on something like the “morality” of it all, and would probably be so worried about “doing the right thing” that they would not act until too late.
There is nothing written in the stars that says that the U.S. should not be populated solely by whites, or Mexicans, or blacks, or baboons. The only thing that counts in this case is the will-to-power! Do white Americans have it? Could they get it back if they’ve lost it?
What our people are going to need for the eventual denouement of the race problem is a careful yet bold leader with his wits about him, at the head of an army or mass movement, who could act as Caesar did when he reached the Rubicon. In his Life of Caesar, Plutarch tells us that when he came to the fateful stream in 49 B.C., he paused in thought for a long time, silently “computing how many calamities his passing that river would bring upon mankind.” Finally, though, “with a sort of passion… uttering the phrase with which men usually prelude their plunge into desperate and daring fortunes, ‘Let the die be cast,’ he hastened to cross the river.”
SOURCE: The Liberty Bell, December 1991