We Must Know Our Racial Past
The Study of Languages. Historically, investigation regarding the origins of the white, Aryan or Indo-European peoples has been confined to methods and time frames consistent with and constrained by Biblical interpretations in the book of Genesis. This confined all discussion of the subject to no earlier than 2350 B.C. or about 1,656 years after the Biblical story of the creation, when the families of Noah disembarked from the ark and set out to populate the world. Consequently most of the early attempts to set the historical record straight involved speculative interpretations of ancient classical texts, as well as politically motivated fabrications of medieval monks. It was not until the development of the science of linguistics that racial studies moved from the realm of myth and guesswork to the scientific arena of fact.
The progress from savagery to civilization is intimately bound up with the advance of abstract thinking, which has enabled the world’s civilized peoples to rise above the chaos of animal sensations and to fashion an ordered cosmos. The growth of reasoning in turn goes hand in hand with the development of language. Words, after all, are the very seeds of thought. It follows that a common language not only implies a common mental outlook among its speakers, but to a large extent also reflects the general progress of a race as it moves from animalism to savagery, from savagery to barbarism and finally from barbarism to civilization. Philology, the study of languages, may therefore claim a place among the historical disciplines, so far as it is able to trace and interpret the progress of early civilizations.
The close relationships between some European languages had been explored as early as the beginning of the 17th century. In 1767 a member of both the Royal Society and the Society of Antiquaries, James Parsons, did some research on the most ancient peoples of Europe and Asia. Through a comparison of linguistically similar elements contained in different languages he was able to offer a guide to the relative affinity these groups shared and to their distant origins. He concluded that the languages of Europe, Iran and India were all derived from a common linguistic ancestor. Parsons can well be credited with the independent discovery of what we now call the Indo-European language family.
After Parsons’ discovery, and in 1796, William Jones, then Chief Justice of India and a scholar in linguistics, proposed that Sanskrit, Gothic and Celtic languages as well as old Persian belonged to the same family. It was not, however, until the beginning of the 19th century that the development of comparative philology allowed us to arrive at the concept of a linguistic affinity unfathered by Noah. Modern studies have revealed a commonalty among the languages of ancient white peoples stretching from the Atlantic to India. This suggests a single source or ancestry that was the precursor to the Indo-European, a language that has been termed Proto-Indo-European. Archaeological evidence shows that the Proto-Indo-European peoples and, by extension their vocabulary, appeared on the scene in Neolithic times, an appearance not coincidentally corresponding to the first widespread domestication of animals. Irrespective of the advancements made through the study of language similarities, this line of study was limited because the occupation of Europe by Indo-Europeans invariably predates the written historical record.
Archaeological Evidence and Radiocarbon Dating. We know that the study of race is a multidisciplinary field. It draws upon linguistics, but also from History, Anthropology, Archaeology, Biology and other fields of expertise. One of the least likely of scientific fields, yet in retrospect one of the most important to the discovery of the origins of peoples, was that of Atomic Physics, a study with which, until comparatively recently, archaeologists were unfamiliar.
In 1949, Willard F. Libby opened a door to the past which egalitarian Marxism never succeeded in closing – a scientific method of dating using radiocarbon or carbon-14.
Now with Colin Renfrew’s advancements in radiocarbon techniques we know with certainty that European cultures are of greater antiquity than previously supposed. The megalithic tombs of Western Europe, we now know, are older than the Pyramids, which were once thought to have preceded them. Indeed they rank as the earliest stone monuments in the world. The “Newgrange” tomb in Ireland has been dated to 3350 B.C. and a tomb in Brittany to an astounding 4300 B.C. We also know that early metal-using cultures of Europe antedate both Troy and the Bronze Age Aegean, from which they were presumed to have derived. Through microscopic analysis Alexander Marshack has taken the European time line even further back. He postulates an advanced time-based and time-factoring culture, capable of advanced thought processes and astronomical measurements thousands of years before it was deemed possible.
The origins of our culture become less important when we realize that the creators of culture, notwithstanding their specific geographic origins, were biologically the selfsame people as we. That is, a generally dolichocranial, invariably tall and unquestionable white race. The darkening and coarseness of many peoples currently seen in the Middle East and India are reflective of inbreeding with more primitive peoples over a period of several thousand years. It is not a mirror of their physical appearance at the time of their cultural Zenith. Even in ancient Hittite inscriptions our people were referred to as Hari, the blond people. Indeed there is substantial evidence to indicate that this very down-breeding led directly to the decline and dissolution of these once proud and advanced civilizations. The practice of incest among the Vanar, a people of Nordic and Germanic mythology, and among the “God Kings” of Egypt may well have been an attempt to protect the bloodlines against such degeneration.
Natural Selection. White, Aryan, Indo-European peoples have inhabited the European continent at least since the Early Bronze Age, perhaps as far back as 7,000 years ago or even longer. For all intents and purposes they were identical to the modern Caucasian. The white race is unmistakably the child of the earth of his European homeland.
Some 100,000 years ago the ancestors of our race may have migrated to their current cold and stressful Eurasian climates. There the harsh and unforgiving landscape influenced the temperament, as well as the creativity, of these ancient ancestral people. The harsher climates selected for larger brains, more forward planning, a longer time horizon, greater family stability and increased longevity, with concomitant reductions in sex hormones, speed of maturation, reproductive fertility and aggressiveness. This latter feature, whatever its negative effects, is a blessed necessity for complex cultural development.
Other humanoid subraces adopted different survival mechanisms. The Negro developed greater bone density, a higher percentage of “quick-twitch” muscle fiber, higher levels of testosterone, faster rates of growth to sexual maturation and higher rates of reproductivity. In a strictly evolutionary sense, there is no right or wrong way in which nature acts to ensure the survival of a given species – only successes and failures. In this respect both the Negroid and the white can be said to be on more or less equal terms. Survival is one thing, civilization is another. Evidence from a variety of scientific fields demonstrates that the beginnings of our race and the beginnings and maintenance of civilization are irreconcilably linked.
Ancient Journeys. In ancient times our people expanded from their Eurasian homeland and mastered all of Europe. The Indo-Europeans brought their culture to the icy North and storm-tossed western lands of the continent. To the south our ancestors ventured to the limits of the Sahara and Africa’s Atlas Mountains, where to this day pale Bedouins relatively unpolluted by Arabia’s now swarthy multitudes, still move to the seasonal pulse of nature. To the east, we went through the Khyber Pass and along the timeless old “silk road.” Auburn and red-headed people have recently been found in remote areas of China where previous history dictated they were never supposed to have been.
Similar interest is provoked by a white ruling class among the population of the Incas who were identified to Pizarro as being the viracochas, “a divine race of white men with beards.” Thor Heyerdahl’s seminal study of Easter Island shed light upon a white race which once inhabited eastern Polynesia. Here a people called the oho-tea are said by the native populations to have been a race which in “olden times had white skin, red hair and blue eyes.” According to Heyerdahl’s studies they were eliminated in a final war by the more primitive yet more numerous Hanau momoko people, the descendants of whom now are the sole inhabitants of the sorry little island.
From Kashmir to Mysore in the western provinces of India our race’s influence prevailed and established cultures that were old before the annals of recorded time. The caste system was introduced into India by our Aryan cousins millennia ago in a failed attempt at maintaining racial integrity. The Sanskrit word for caste, varna, means color. Even today, after the infusion of ancient Aryan blood so many centuries ago, we still find the occasional blue-eyed Brahman (the highest caste) conversing in a language whose Aryan roots weave the story of our greatness back though the mists of time.
An American Beginning: An American End. In ancient North America the impact of our race was similarly felt. A 9,300-year-old Caucasian male was found on the banks of the Columbia River in Washington State, the so-called “Columbia River Man.” As in so many other areas of the world where the thought police rule and news is suppressed and twisted, information of white achievement has been suppressed. If it checks out, Columbia River Man would revise everything we thought we knew about early man in the Americas. In the light of these and similar findings it is now considered possible that the earliest waves of humans coming across the Bering land bridge were not the ancestors of the people we now call Native Americans. Many of the traces left behind by these early trekkers display markedly Caucasian features. It is possible, perhaps even probable, given the historical precedents from around the globe, that they were the victims of genocide perpetrated by the proto-Indians.
We continue to find that our race’s travels in Paleolithic times were more extensive and wondrous than previously imagined. Wherever we went we brought with us our unique gift – civilization. These early pioneering cultures have now fallen into ruin. With the decline of the spark of white creativity, no one was left to build. Once prosperous cities have now decayed, along with the sad monuments to nearly forgotten achievements. Will this also be the fate of our civilization? In spite of our self-deluded retreat from responsibility, we still continue to hold sway over the ever shrinking remnants of a civilized world that is still the envy of backward peoples everywhere. Whites must remember that without the continuation and the survival of their race, not only their culture, but all high civilization may end and a dark pall of ignorance will settle on the earth.
SOURCE: Liberty Bell, August 1997