The Way Ahead, part 4/7 – FOLK

Colin Jordan


The immediately preceding instalment in this series dealt with one of the great Rs in the lexicon of the Vanguard: Religion. This instalment proceeds to deal with the second: Race. It does so within the context of the community of race, designated as the Folk, and this in historic perspective. Religion and Race go hand in hand in complementary roles. In their interaction the spirit of man is a reflection of the physical and mental nature of the body, and this nature is in turn a reflection of his spirit.

A most vital requirement, which must become an unfailing hallmark of the men and women of the Vanguard, is the attainment of a high degree of racial awareness; this, joined to the religious awareness already dealt with, being the precondition for their role in the struggle for victory which thereby can, even now, be successful. This racial awareness is tripartite in constituent requirements, encompassing a knowledge of racial differentiations, a knowledge of racial history, and a knowledge of our racial jeopardy today and for the future.

The thesis now to be presented, summarized in advance, is that all that has been illustrious in the past of our people has been no mere product of environmental factors identically affecting all human beings, but instead the inseparable consequence of the distinctive racial nature and outstanding racial capacity of our people, inconceivable without that nature and that capacity. Through that racial nature and capacity our people have been pre-eminently the makers of civilization.

Today in the cumulative consequence of a long period of decline, currently aggravated and accelerated most massively, the makers of civilization, and thus civilization itself, are undergoing drastic decline leading to eventual disappearance. Just as we are confronted with a spiritual sickness, contained in Christianity, which has to be overcome, so too we are confronted with its corollary, a racial sickness, specifically equalitarian multiracialism, which has to be defeated if it is not to defeat and end us.

Today we lie in the deadly grasp of Democracy, declared to be the finest conceivable system, yet instead to be discerned as just about the very worst imaginable because of the extent to which it inherently serves to disguise and defraud concerning its purposes, workings and consequences. Instead of devotion to the production, protection and elevation of higher humanity as the indispensable means for a higher human society in fulfilment of Nature’s evolutionary design, Democracy in all its known practice is manifestly devoted to the disregard, the denial and the dismissal of this purpose.


The underlying design of Democracy’s masters is to bring about a deracinated, mongrelized, standardized, man-centred, materialistic, consumer-conceived world citizen. This is so because such a processed deviant will be the human unit most advantageous to the would-be controllers of the globe in pursuit of their purses and power. Thus the synthetic serf who is the designed subject of Democracy, instead of being distinguished as a member of the Folk, the community of his race, is conceived as a creature of the market place of the world, a conforming unit in a global herd, a consumer of material products and manufactured ideas, kept subdued and content with the lure of lucre and the lust of commercialized sex.

Conflicting with Nature’s purpose of upliftment over all past milleniums, and instead pursuing the path all history has shown to be that of the downfall and disappearance of civilizations of the past, the system and society of Democracy is thus intended to multiply and elevate the inferior of this earth in place of the superior; this for the better benefit of the rapacious lords of this earth. Herein lies the succinct truth expressed by Britain’s great pioneer of the Folk ideal, Arnold Leese, in the three words: “Democracy is Death. “

The furtherance of this deadly racial design of Democracy amounts to a colossal conspiracy of harm reaching into every part of life. It starts in the schools with the ruthless and rigid exclusion of all Folk knowledge, and the systematic suppression of our children’s instinctive racial sensitivity, and in its place the persistent and multifarious indoctrination of race mixture, accompanied by unisexual and even homosexual egalitarianism. For this mental rape and perversion of our children the foul perpetrators of this crime, namely teachers, rightly deserve to be shot on sight, one and all of them, even if we currently confine ourselves to their execration.

Beyond that starting point in the schools, serving as incubators of racial ruin, a miasma is daily disgorged by the enemies of our Folk throughout every avenue of life and into all reaches of society, stiffling racial knowledge and numbing racial sensitivity. Others of alien race, even the very lowest in capacity, are ceaselessly projected and elevated favourably to familiarize us with them as acceptable, facilitating the next diabolical step which is to accustom the public to interracial integration and sex. The coming together on the television screen and in the newspaper and magazine columns is intended to find its culmination in the bedroom, and thereby on the deathbed of our race which is miscegenation. Here again the responsible enemies of our Folk, wreaking their hate and harm, richly deserve the most severe and salutary punishment.


So it is that this conspiracy is in reality nothing short of genocide. In support of this contention there can now be cited the Genocide Convention of none other than one segment of the vast apparatus of that conspiracy, to wit the United Nations. This Convention defined “Acts Constituting Genocide” in its Article II as follows: “In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, as such.” It then went on to include as one of these Acts:
(c) “Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.”
Think about this, and you will surely come to appreciate that this is exactly what in all its implications, present and future is happening: genocide! Only a lunatic, however, would expect any succour from the United Nations for this form of genocide.

At this point, before proceeding to distinguish and define in detail what is meant by our “Folk”, and to identify its making of civilization in recent millenniums, thereby evaluating the loss if Democracy succeeds in its ultimate objectives, so that an Age of Darkness descends on the world; some consideration of geophysical prehistory affecting our most distant ancestors will be useful to set matters in fuller perspective. This will allow for the likelihood of civilizations beyond our ken and record in these present days when our own civilization is crumbling away.

The warnings now being issued as to the gigantic and disastrous effects to be expected from what is called “global warming” should make us more readily receptive to the indications of long distant, vast upheavals in the world’s ground surfaces water levels and climate occurring repeatedly for one reason or another from the point of the world’s creation out of the infinity of the universe. The emergent fact is that of interminable flux as the characteristic of that universe. With its recognition must surely come the realization of the possibility at least, even without signs which exist and increase, of great and vanished civilizations besides and preceding the recorded ones of general acquaintance.

A stimulus to this expanded perception of life is provided by a 1995 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, reflecting a consensus of 2,000 top meteorologists and other experts consulted, which recorded several of Antarctica’s ice sheets disintegrating, flowers and grasses rapidly appearing there, and seas rising rapidly with, as the result in view, “the end of a 10,000-year period in which relatively stable climate has allowed human civilization to begin and flourish.” (Independent on Sunday15 October 1995)


This mention of melting ice sheets and a rise in sea level calls to mind the fascinating abundance of folk memories of lost lands and sunken civilizations, a lesser one of which was the reputed land of Lyonesse, featured in Arthurian legend, said to have been located off the south coast of Cornwall between Land’s End and the Scilly Isles, and eventually submerged. Another was the sunken continent of Mu, investigated and presented by James Churchward in his books including “The Lost Continent of Mu” (Futura Publications, 1974). He located Mu in the Pacific as extending from north of Hawaii to as far south as the Fijis and Easter Island; described it as dominated by a White race, and declared it was obliterated by terrific earthquakes and associated submersion 12,000 years ago.

Best known of all is Atlantis, subject of speculation in hundreds of books as to its whereabouts in the Atlantic or elsewhere: a fabulous land of spectacular development which also experienced terrestrial upheaval, an upheaval causing its submergence. Jurgen Spanuth (“Atlantis of the North” Sidgwick & Jackson, London, 1979) plausibly centred it on Heligoland, and dated its submergence in the sea at 1200 B.C. He equated it with the land of the Hyperboreans, depicted in the myths of Ancient Greece as a people living in a land of sunshine and plenty beyond the north wind to whose wonderful apple orchard Homer made reference, and which has a suggestive similarity to the Hesperides, or Islands of the Blessed of Ancient Greek and Roman myth, home of the legendary golden apples of immortality. This also connects with the Arthurian legend of the apple island called Avalun or Avalon to which King Arthur was conveyed after death. The “Oera Linda Book”, an ancient history of the Nordic Frisians of present-day Holland, spoke of a lost land of Atland as an outstandingly civilized, large landmass around the north and east of the British Isles which was submerged in 2193 B.C. in consequence of a cosmic impact. Its climate was described as sub-tropical, a contrast to that of the area today which, however, should occasion no surprise when account is taken of the fact that Greenland is known once to have had a sub-tropical climate also, and scientific investigations have shown that the coasts of the Antarctic Continent were once free from ice and that the south polar climate was warm. Indeed a Dr. B.G. Tilak has put forward the speculation that about 10,000 years ago all the Aryan tribes lived in the polar region, but were forced south when the ice sheet formed there.

Whether this particular theory is sustainable or not, it is an accepted fact that after 1400 B.C. the climate changed in Britain and across Europe, becoming colder and wetter than before. As for the recurrent alterations in sea level, one has only to take note of the undisputed fact that Britain was once physically joined to the Continent of Europe, and that Alaska and Siberia were once upon a time similarly joined, to find nothing unbelievable or even strange in the legends of lost lands.

Folk legends so often preserve at least a kernel of historical fact lost to conventional history. Indeed, enshrined in the nursery stories of giants and the folk tales of “wee folk” may well be the persistent memory of some distant time when a breed of huge humans did exist, and also a period when a breed of dwarfish humans did live in caves and underground refuges, both becoming extinct by slaughter or mutation or cosmic collision.


A remarkable change of climate at the poles is easily and sufficiently explained by a geographical shift of the poles towards the equator, or even a full geographical reversal of the poles; given a necessary triggering phenomenon. Such a triggering phenomenon could be a change for whatever reason in the polar magnetic axis, or alternatively the effect of some planetary body passing very near to the earth, if not actually hitting it. A prominent exponent of the latter explanation was Immanuel Velikovsky (“Worlds in Collision”, Victor Gollancz Ltd, 1950) who contended that the planet Venus, born from Jupiter, passed near to the earth, nearly colliding with it, before settling into orbit. This had catastrophic effects, including maybe tilting the earth’s axis, and occurred about 3,500 years ago.

Relevant to polar change is an amazing map of the world published in 1531 A.D. by a leading cartographer of the time, Oronteus Finaeus, which showed an Antarctic with an ice-free circumference and accurately marked rivers and mountains not visible today because under a great depth of ice. The cartographic section of the U.S. Air Force at Westover Air Force Base in Massachusetts, U.S.A., investigated the map some years ago and concluded that it was very accurate. one can thus only suppose that the map was based on some record of the long distant past now unknown to the world.

The Finnish epic, “The Kalevala”, pointed to a time of cosmic upheaval when, temporarily, the sun and thus the image of the moon disappeared from the sky. This, presumably, was due to the irregular interposition of some other cosmic force.

The great master of the sublime music of our race, Richard Wagner, portrayed in “Gotterdammerung”, the final phase of his operatic cycle, “The Ring”, the Ragnarok of Norse legend, the culminating conflict of forces out of which the old order is destroyed, but from which destruction a new order is generated. Ragnarok, the legend has it, was precipitated by the Fimbelvetr, the terrible winter when the frost giants ruled. This may be taken as the figurative folk memory of one of the recurrent ice ages experienced by our planet as a result of cosmic alteration of one kind or another.


What has been said so far concerning cosmic change and catastrophe brings us to the theory of Hans Horbiger (1860-1931). As expounded in “The Glacial Cosmogony of Horbiger” BY Philip Fauth, published in German in 1913, the greater part of it written by Horbiger himself, this is the theory of perpetual struggle in infinite space between fire and ice, the forces of attraction and repulsion, resulting in recurrent extinction and renewal. It is a theory providing a comprehensive vision of the evolution of the cosmos, and the changes on earth, corroborated by ancient mythology. It accounts for great civilizations preceding the more immediate and publicized ones by hundreds of thousands, maybe millions of years. Such a timescale makes a back-cloth against which our own contemporary situation of rise and fall becomes dwarfed!in contextual significance, however much we in that situation rightly invest it with relative importance.

In the beginning of the earth, said Horbiger, there was a generative conflict between fire and ice in that a far larger sun than at present collided with a huge planet of cosmic ice which penetrated it deeply, resulting in an explosion out of which was ejected the material to form the earth and its moon. This explanation echoes the ancient Norse Edda, repository of much ancient record in mythical form, which speaks of Ginnungagap as a place and time where matter (ice) and energy (fire) came together in an act of creation.

According to Horbiger, the key to an understanding of great geological and climatic changes which time and time again have convulsed the earth, bringing a sudden and catastrophic end to civilization after civilization beyond our ken, and which will happen again and again, lies in our moon, or more precisely in the succession of our moons. The moon over an immensity of time, he contended, is caused to approach the earth in an ever-narrowing spiral which brings it even to hit the earth, and thereafter to relinquish its role in relation to the earth, moving off into space, to be replaced by another secondary planet attracted into service as an orbiting satellite of the earth.

In the course of this lunar descent on the earth, the gravitational pull of the satellite causes the earth’s seas to rise greatly, drowning people and places, artifacts and edifices and the accumulated knowledge of civilizations. The moon we see today, illuminated by the sun as the powerhouse and life-giver of our existence, is the fourth of such satellites to be captured by the earth, said Horbiger. His theory has been summarized in English by H.S. Bellamy in his “Moons, Myths and Man” (Faber & Faber, London, 1936).

Whatever the verdict on Horbiger’s theory, there is undeniable need for a structure of thought which is nothing less than cosmic and lifewide in order to generate the power of mind, through the force of comprehension, to tackle successfully the task confronting us. Such an all – embracing outlook is named a “Weltanschauung” in German National-Socialist terminology. Those without it, meaning mere nationalists, “patriots” and nominal but underdeveloped National-Socialists, lack all that greater capacity for, successful struggle to be derived from breadth and depth of knowledge put to action by zeal and faith, and so cannot cope with the demands of that struggle. The purpose of “The Way Ahead’ is a mobilization and equipment of the mind through the full development of the inherent implications of the National-Socialist Weltanschauung.


Let us move on now to consider and establish definitions of Race as the prior step to further examination of the subject. Here the first choice is between the school of thought which establishes by a grouping of physical and mental characteristics a number of races as overlying the contemporary nation-states, thus providing a basis of thought for a bond transcending those nation-states; and, on the other hand, that school of thought which views a nation – state as itself creating in time, through common residence and common culture within it, a race out of nationality.

An exponent of the latter view was Sir Arthur Keith in his book “A New Theory of Human Evolution”. An exponent of the former was Hans F.K. Gunther. The writer of this article adheres to the attitude of this last authority. He accepts that the community of a contemporary nation-state does create through the mingling within it over the course of time a distinct blend of people which may be regarded as being a secondary race. However, he views this as after all a blend of primary races, each one of which is manifest as extending beyond national boundaries by virtue of its points of identity or at least most close similarity transcending those points of difference between nations brought about by the formative conditions of national segregation.

The classification thus overstepped is one which this writer feels overstates the ethnic significance of nationality. It is one, he feels, which carried to its logical conclusion opens the door to that grievous article of faith of Democracy that residence, not race, is the determinant of nationality. Hence anything and everything human taking up residence here in Britain automatically becomes as British as our ancestral racial stock. Nationality, thereby, becomes reduced basically to a matter just of geography.

There is next the need to avoid the pitfall of reading racial significance into what is really only a linguistic link. This is the assumption that because people speak the same language they are necessarily akin racially which is most clearly not so. Taken to extreme lengths this fallacy would racially equate the English-speaking Negro from Trinidad with an English-speaking descendant of the Vikings in the Yorkshire Dales. On a less ridiculous but still fallacious level, this mode of assessment confuses and combines quite different racial elements among the White people of Europe and the rest of the world.


This now brings us to consideration of the term “Aryan” and differences of opinion on this score. On the one hand there are those who argue that the term is of linguistic significance only, relating to peoples speaking languages of such marked similarity as to justify the banding together of those languages as “Indo – European”; and that accordingly it should be abandoned as a racial term. Gunther is among them, saying: “To-day the term Aryan has gone out of scientific use and its use is not advisable Racial investigation in the beginning sometimes called the (non-existing) white or Caucasian race Aryan; later the peoples of Indo-European speech were occasionally called Aryan; and finally the Nordic race also was termed Aryan” (p. 257 “Racial Elements of European History” (Methuen, London, 1927).

In agreement with Gunther is Madison Grant, author of the equally important work, “The Passing of the Great Race” (Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, 1918); reprinted in 1970 by Arno Press Inc., U.S.A. He dismissed as “mythical” the denotement of an Aryan race, saying: “The name’ Aryan race, must also be frankly discarded as a term of racial significance …although there was at one time, of course, an identity between the original Aryan tongue and the race which first spoke and developed it” (P. 67).

In conflict is the learned L.A. Waddell who in his massive tome, “The Makers of Civilization in Race and History” (Luzac & Co., London, 1929) developed his case impressively for the usage of the term as a synonym for the Nordic race. He endorsed the English scientific writer, T.H. Huxley, who in an article entitled “The Aryan Question” in the Nineteenth Century magazine (November 1890) stated “There was and is an Aryan race, that is to say the characteristic modes of speech termed Aryan were developed among the Blond Longheads alone, however much some of these may have been modified by the importation of Non Aryan elements.”

A middle ground is occupied by those, seemingly including Adolf Hitler, who have used the term not as an indiscriminate one for all of the White races speaking Indo-European languages, but for people who have at least a substantial Nordic element in them, if not a predominance of that element, the rest of their racial make-up being of other White stock. Providing use of the term does refer to a substantial Nordic element in those to whom it is applied, it seems acceptable. Otherwise the collective term “White” – accepting that this is properly speaking not a reference to some single race but to the whole array of White races – seems preferable.

That Hitler’s National-Socialism conceived and cherished the Nordic element as the central and most important element of what it referred to as “Aryan” is borne out by the emphasis placed on it by that National-Socialism’s vanguard, the SS. Its Engagement and Marriage Decree, issued above Himmler’s signature, stipulated: 1. “The SS is an association of German men of Nordic determination selected on special criteria.”


In now distinguishing the various White races, the five-fold classification of Hans F.K. Gunther will be followed. The first of these races, and for us ancestrally the most important, is the Nordic Race, which Waddell and Gunther were in agreement on as being the great creator and mainstay of civilization. In physical characteristics the Nordic is tall, longheaded, narrow – faced with a narrow nose with a high bridge, smooth or wavy blond or brown hair, deep – sunk blue or grey eyes, and a fair skin. In mental characteristics the Nordic is frank, boldly courageous, inquisitive, given to calm judgement; has a strong sense of justice and is endowed with energy and also restraint and self – discipline. He is marked out to be an organizer, an aristocrat, a leader and a ruler.

Next is the Mediterranean Race which in physical characteristics is short in stature, long -headed, narrow-faced with a narrow nose which has a high bridge, smooth or curly brown or black hair, deep-sunk brown eyes and a brownish skin. In mental characteristics the Mediterranean is passionate and excitable, highly individualistic, and with a lesser sense of law and order than the Nordic, but in artistic accomplishment he can excel the Nordic.

Thirdly we have the Alpine Race, physically characterized as short in stature, round – headed, broad – faced with a flat and short nose with a low bridge, and with stiff brown or black hair, obtrusive brown eyes and yellow-brownish skin. Alpines are characteristically hardworking, stolid and narrow – minded and unimaginative, lacking initiative, and averse to individuality.

Next is the Dinaric Race which in physical characteristics is tall, short-headed, narrow-faced with a very distinctive steep back to the head, having a very prominent nose with a high bridge, curly brown or black hair’, deep-sunk brown eyes and a brownish skin. The Dinarics are downright, goodtempered and brave, and rated by some as second among the races of Europe for mental capacity.

Finally of the five races of Europe is the East Baltic Race; short in stature, short-headed, distinctively broad-faced across the cheek-bones, with a rather broad and short nose with a low bridge, and with stiff and light hair and grey or whitish blue eyes and a light skin with a grey undertone. People of this race are inclined to have a changeable disposition, and, it is said, to act without thinking and to think without acting.

What marks out the European nations, one from another, are the proportions of the mixture of the five races distinguished by Gunther. These proportions can be viewed both laterally in the populations of districts and individually in the racial composition of persons. From this an overall assessment can be reached. Doing so, Gunther, writing in the 1920s, assessed Britain then as Nordic 55-60%, Mediterranean 30% and Alpine 10%. A reprint of Gunthers classic work, a copy of which should be in the home of every member of the Vanguard.

Other good sources for the books on Race and Folk History and other aspects of National-Socialism which need to be systematically studied by men and women of the Vanguard to fit themselves for their role are: In the UK Historical Review Press, PO Box 62, Uckfield, Sussex, TN22,1 ZY, UK and in the USA: National Vanguard Books, P.O. Box 330, Hillsboro, WV 24946, U.S.A. From the U.K. and elsewhere outside the U.S.A. send an international reply coupon for a current catalogue.


In thus making a racial assessment across Europe, there is need to take into account the appreciable influx of other racial elements from outside Europe into many parts of it. This has happened not only in the present century and most substantially during the second half of it in consequence of Democracy’s disastrous “victory” in its anti-Aryan Second World War; but also in times long earlier. This influx came about partly through hostile incursions.

One such was that of the Asiatic Huns who overran and remained in occupation of much of Europe for a couple of centuries commencing with the 4th A.D. Another was that of the Moors, a mixture of Arabs and Berbers from North Africa who invaded Spain in the 8th Century A.D., and, while defeated by the Nordic Franks under Charles Martel in 732 A.D., were not finally ejected from Europe till 1492 with the result that many Spaniards today show the genetical evidence of the long Moorish residence. A third was that of the Asiatic Turks, originating in Mongolia, who in 1550 had gained control of the Balkans, Greece remaining under that control for nearly 400 years till 1821, and with substantial racial results.

Besides such hostile incursions there was also the importation of slaves such as in Roman times. Later on there was the admission of colonial subjects, such as the Malays into Holland since the 17th Century A.D.; and the miscegenation which sooner or later resulted from this.

In consequence, Eastern Europe obtained both a Hither Asiatic strain and an Inner Asiatic strain, which latter strain is also present in Northern Finland and in Sweden and Norway. Southern Europe, particularly Spain and the south of Italy, obtained a Hither Asiatic strain also, along with a Negro element. Spain and the south of Italy also obtained a lesser Oriental strain. Considering Jews now, and continuing to refer to Gunther as our authority, he began by dismissing talk of a “Semitic race”, laying down that there are only Semitic-speaking peoples. Thereupon he defined the Sephardim or southern Jews as a mixture of Oriental, Hither Asiatic, Mediterranean, Hamitic, Nordic and Negro, with the Oriental predominating. The Ashkenazim or eastern Jews he defined as a mixture of Hither Asiatic, Oriental, East Baltic, Inner Asiatic, Nordic, Hamitic and Negro, with the Hither Asiatic predominating. In so far as either the Oriental or the Hither Asiatic element predominates in the presence of other, non-European, racial elements, Jews cannot rightly be regarded as White, which term can only rightly refer to those with a predominance of one or a mixture of several of the five White races classified by our authority, and this without the inclusion of any other racial element whatsoever.

Support for this view comes from Jewish authorities themselves. For instance, the South African Rand Daily Mail (15 May 1972) under a headline “Jews Are Not White” quoted Jewish scholar, Prof. Leonard Fein of Brandeis University in the U.S.A., as addressing a congress of the South African Jewish Board of Deputies in Johannesburg, and saying: “

You are not Whites – either symbolically or literally …”

In his scholarly book “The Genetics of the Jews ” (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1978) A.E. Mourant declared: “Nearly all Jewish communities show a substantial proportion of African Negroid marker genes, such as to imply a total Negro admixture of the order of 5 to 10 percent.” There can be added to this the statement of Dr. Leo Sachs, head of the genetics section of the Weitzmann Institute of Science in Israel, speaking in New York on a visit a while back, that his study had revealed that all Jews “have certain strong similarities in certain characteristics, such as the fingerprints, which indicate ancestral origin in the Eastern Mediterranean.”


The preceding mention of Negro racial influx prompts now some consideration of this stock. It is generally accepted that the ratio of brain weight to whole body weight is a rough index of intelligence. The anthropologist Sir Arthur Keith (“A New Theory of Human EvoLution”) rated the African Negro was having a brain weight about 100 c.c. less than that of Whites (which has been set at 1500 c.c.). Keith set the Australian aborigines at about 1200 c.c. and the gorilla at 470 c.c.

To cite some other authorities, Connolly described the Negro brain as less tissured and less complex than the White brain, and Vint reported it as having a reduced thickness in the frontal cortical layers which are those most recent in evolutionary development and which are operative in reasoning and abstract thinking. Carleton Coon, a past president of the American Anthropological Association, held in his book “The origin of Races” (Knopf, New York, 1962) that the Negro is less advanced in an evolutionary sense that the White by as much as perhaps 200,000 years. He described the frontal lobe of the Negro forebrain as less developed than that of the White, thus limiting the ability of the Negro in thinking, planning and educational capability, and retarding him in social adjustment to society, and ability to live within the realm of law and order.

The 1lth Edition of the “Encyclopaedia Britannica” – before the dictatorship of “political correctness” became established to exclude awkward reality, and to compel adherence to Democracy’s agenda of decadence – stated on Page 244 that in certain characteristics the Negro “would appear to stand on a lower evolutionary plane that the white man, and to be more closely related to the highest anthropoids Mentally the negro is inferior to the white. “

Nobel Prize winner in physics for his invention of the transistor, Prof. William Shockley made a major study of I.Q. differences between races, and found that Negroes scored an average of 15 points less than Whites on every test. His conclusion was “The major deficit in Negro intellectual performance must be primarily of hereditary origin and thus relatively irremediable by any practical improvements in the environment.” The recent study by Richard J. Herrnstein and Charles Murray, published as “The Bell Curve” (The Free Press, London, 1994), came up with an identical disparity between Negro and White I.Q. scores, and argued that I.Q. is largely genetic and hereditary.

As an indication of incapacity, prior to the entry of the Whites to Africa, the Negro had no written languages, no conception of numerals, no ploughs and no wheels. English historian Arnold J. Toynbee said in summary “The Black race alone have not contributed positively to any civilization as yet.” The British Association for the Advancement of Science concurred in its 1961 statement: “No contribution to the arts of civilization has come from Africa, which has produced nothing but destruction and ruinous exploitation of its natural resources.” Further to this point, Mankind Quarterly (Spring 1982) referred to studies based on analysis of blood types as indicating that the average American Black has received 20 to 25% of his or her genes from White ancestors.


As part of the sedulously spread propaganda that racial differentiation is a triviality involving no more than such unimportant superficialities as darker or lighter skin, so that all people are simply the same members of mankind, we are told that all human blood is the same apart from conventional groupings devoid of racial significance. This high piece of integrative propaganda is increasingly disproved scientifically by advances in the infant science of blood group study. Yet, through the mindenslaving power of ceaseless media propagation, it is still largely accepted by the human herds of Democracy.

Several centuries ago in the first practice of blood transfusion even animal blood was believed to be just the same as human blood, and therefore injected into humans, but the practice was then found to be dangerous, harmful and even lethal, and abandoned. Next came restriction to human blood, but human blood mixed with total indiscrimination, and here again the practice was found to be dangerous, harmful and even lethal and abandoned. With the detection of various basic groups within human blood, the next and present practice developed of discriminating according to these basic groups, but only to this extent. It is now high time that the practice of blood transfusion catches up with the expanded detection of blood differences, and thus discriminates to a much greater degree.

Roger Pearson, in his article “The Study of Blood Groups as an Aid to History”, originally published in Northern World magazine (January-February 1957) and subsequently reprinted as a pamphlet, spotlighted this field of research as providing an immensely valuable key to racial analysis because a blood group is a characteristic entirely dependent on hereditary, and is fixed for life. New blood groups are still being discovered, he explained, going on to quote (Page 8) the Dr. Mourant already referred to regarding Jews as having declared in his work “The Distribution of Human Blood Groups” that “from the blood group point of view, the chief feature of the peoples of this important region comprising England, France, the Low Countries, Scandinavia and parts of Switzerland, Germany and Austria is their close similarity to one another”.

Another authority, Sir Ronald Fisher, stated in 1959: “All blood group factors will contribute to the exploration of racial differences in mankind, for the frequences of the different genes vary notably from one race to another; the different races of man, as populations, have become more distinct and better defined, than was possible by the older ethnographic methods.” Also, Science Journal (July 1970) stated: “A large number of genes, both blood group genes and genes affecting bio-chemical reactions, can be used in characterizing human populations. Each human population has its own unique combination of these genes.”


Thus blood is not just some symbolic expression of race, but a rich repository of racial difference. It can even be said to be unique not only for a race, but also for an individual. Hence the present practice of the National Blood Authority in Britain of treating it as all virtually the same within racially insignificant conventional groupings is not only absurd but monstrous. It results in blood donated being completely mixed beyond these groupings on reception and in subsequent transfusions, so that any and every White Briton is today at risk of having Negro or other non-White blood put into his or her veins.

This alien infusion may well be physically harm£ul. It is also most certainly mentally harmful because deeply and constantly humiliating to any and every such person who has both knowledge of the matter and any racial pride whatsoever. Pressure must thus be brought to bear without delay on this “politically correct” but scientifically incorrect National Blood Authority (oak House, Reeds Crescent, Watford, Herts., WDl lQH) to cease immediately this abhorrent practice of merger, and instead adopt a far more detailed discrimination and consequent segregation.

Some hospitals in some countries do already, at least on strong application, provide a facility in respect of an operation requiring a transfusion for the best of all transfusion, namely of your own blood donated in advance of and with a view to the operation. Readers should demand and ensure this practice for themselves. The time is now to find out whether your local hospital will provide the facility on demand, and, if it does not already do so, to agitate that it does; not to leave the matter until you are already faced with a shortly forthcoming operation. This writer’s own enquiry to Harrogate District Hospital, a National Health Service hospital as distinct from a private one, elicited this reply (dated 31 January 1995) from its Director of Operational Services: “Mr. S. Jamieson, Technical Services Coordinator for the Trust’s Pathology Department, has confirmed that facilities do exist for patients of Harrogate Health Care to donate their own blood in advance of an operation with a view to being reinfused with that blood. –I am sure that other Trusts throughout the country will have similar arrangements, but patients would have to check with their local Trust on precisely what can be arranged.”

Passing from blood as an expression of a person’s racial identity to the mind of that person as a repository of emanations of that person’s racial identity, which identity includes the distinctive character of that person’s blood; the notable Swiss psychologist Carl Gustav Jung contended that every race has a “Collective Unconsciousness”, the result of all the collective experiences of a race being genetically transmitted from generat ion to genera t ion. Pre sent within thi s ” Collective Unconsciousness ” are what he described as “Archetypes”, being images that emerge in the subconscious mind of a person and which represent that person’s instinctive understanding of various things. So much for the absurdity that race is no more than a difference of colour and physiognomy!


Having now taken a look at the first stage of racial awareness, namely a knowledge of racial differentiations, let us next proceed to take a look at the second stage, namely the reflection of those differentiations in the course of history. In so doing it will become apparent that civilization after civilization of the higher order has been due to and dependent on the Nordic Race or a predominantly Nordic people, more than to any other single White race or non-White race, even where as was often the case the Nordics were a minority, a racial aristocracy ruling over a population which in the majority was of other race. Following on this it will become apparent also that the great common reason for the decline and the disappearance of these civilizations has always been the dwindling to the point of submergence of the Nordic people responsible for them.

It appears likely that the Nordic Race developed by mutation out of the tall, long-headed, big-brained Cro-Magnon Race which thus constituted what may be termed the proto-Nordic Race; and which may well have been the residue or mutation of a race responsible for great civilizations obliterated by cosmic catastrophes milleniums ago. After an immediately prior period when the very primitive Neanderthals predominated from about 150,000 to about 40,000 years ago, the Cro-Magnons came to the fore between that latter date and about 6-8,000 years ago, coinciding with the later part of the old Stone Age. During this Age the Mediterranean Race, which seems to have separately evolved by mutation from other and older stock, became established in southern and south-eastern Europe, while the Alpine Race conceivably emerged by a particular genetic change from the Cro-Magnon.

It is the majority view that the Nordics, thus derived, came to be located in what is now southern Russia in the region north of the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea some 6,000 years ago, from which location the ethnic designation “Caucasian” is derived. From there they erupted in successive waves of migration over a long period. These took them into the Balkans and the Middle East, into Central Europe and to Scandinavia to establish a new heartland in the latter, and into the Baltic-North Sea area; and from there to Britain, Crete, Greece, Italy and western Asia Minor and elsewhere.


Prof. L.A. Waddell, to whom we have referred earlier, made out a very strong case for the Aryan (Nordic) nature of the civilization of ancient Sumeria in Mesopotamia, at least in respect of its dominant or ruling element in the population as distinct from the subject element. This civilization, which arrived from Cappadocia in Asia Minor and possibly before that from the Danube basin, was one of large cities, magnificently inscribed and sculptured monuments and other works of art, and libraries with hunreds of thousands of official and private documents.

The first Sumerian king, who used writing and established agriculture and in this and other ways merited the recognition he received as the founder of the civilization around 3378 B.C., had a multiplicity of names and titles. He was known as Adam, the prototype of his namesake in the purloined story of the Garden of Eden in the Genesis of the Jewish Old Testament; having as his wife an Eve who was the granddaughter of a Gothic sea king, their son being a Cain. Carvings, sculptures and sacred seals show him clad in his characteristic Gothic dress as befitted one of the ancestral Goths.

Waddell closely associated this Sumerian civilization with the Aryan (Nordic) people of Britain through an impressive wealth of evidence offered. For instance, another of the first king’s names was “Tur” which later aspirated as “Thur” or “Thor”, so that he was the human prototype of the deified Thor of the Gothic Norsemen, and also as “Ar-Thur” the original from whom evolved the legendary King Arthur of England. Under another name, “Gaur”, the derivation of George, and in respect of Gauer’s exploit in slaying the human-consuming dragon of the cult of the Semitic Chaldees, he was -with his standard of a red cross – also the original of England’s traditional St. George, later given an obscuring Christian connotation as was the figure of Adam. A later Sumerian king, Barat, who greatly extended the Sumerian empire, was directly associated with Britain, said Waddell: the word “Barat”, abbreviated in usage to “B’r’t” and thence to “Brit”, leading us to Britannia who was a Sumerian goddess of the waters, hence her depiction on British coins of our present era. “Goti” or “Goth”, he said, was a dialectical form of “Khatti” or “Cat ti” which latter term was the title of kings of the Ancient Britons on their coins, thus identifying those Ancient Britons as Goths.


Egyptian civilization, contended Waddell, was an offshoot of Sumerian civilization, and similarly a matter of Aryan (Nordic) rule over a subject people. Sargon the Great of Mesopotamia had a son, Manis or Menes, who founded the first dynasty of Egypt, besides being identical with the founder of the spectacular civilization of Crete, King Minos. Contrary to the persistent efforts today of the forces of White disparagement falsely to elevate the Negro past, there is no evidence that Negroes contributed anything of value to Egyptian civilization; although people of Mediterranean Race undoubtedly figured largely in the population of Ancient Egypt and contributed considerably to that civilization. Indeed, standing by the banks of the Nile as a frontier post at Ancient Egypt’s southern boundary was a stone inscribed with hieroglyphics reading: “From this spot to eternity no Negro may sail down the Nile.”

Since then, migration and miscegenation, the great solvents of greatness, have drastically altered and darkened the people of Egypt. The Egyptians of today keep company with the colossal pyramids and other stone structures of the mighty civilization of old, but racially they bear hardly any resemblance to its makers.

During the second millenium B.C., Nordics of the tribe of the Sacae entered India to establish their role as conquerors of the small and dark, racially alien, original inhabitants. The oldest of the Sanscrit writings, the Rig-Veda, compiled about 1500 B.C., records the word “Arya” as signifying noble kinship, and refers to the ancestral stock as that of tall, fair-haired and blue-eyed warriors, a stock which the caste system was designed to preserve, but ultimately failed to do, so that today all that is left amid India’s teeming millions is some sign of some residual Aryan blood in the very highest of those castes.


The civilization of Ancient Greece continues to dazzle us with the splendour of its public buildings and the sophistication of its thought. All its brilliance was the output of the creative power of the Nordic Race, the pacemaker of the White peoples. It arose in consequence of successive waves of Nordic immigration into a land whose original population was largely 0£ Mediterranean Race. The very first Nordic influx can be set at between 3,000 and 2,000 B.C. This was followed by that of the Ionians, then that of the Achaeans about 1400 B.C., and finally about 1100 B.C. by that of the Doric tribes.

The legends, the statues and the sculptures of the gods of Ancient Greece significantly depict the Nordic features of the ruling and civilizing element in the heyday of its civilization. Athene, for instance, is shown as blue-eyed and Aphrodite as golden-haired. The downfall of those responsible for all the magnificence of building, the beauty of person and the richness of thought came as the customary and inevitable consequence of racial deterioration. By the relaxations of misguided tolerance, nonNordics, who originally were excluded from citizenship, were made into citizens and thence into breeding partners, and so a great people were bred out, and today those dwelling amid the ruins are almost entirely racial strangers.

Egyptian records described Libyans of that time as blond. The Philistines and the Amorites of Palestine appear to have been yet other examples of a Nordic ruling class establishing itself over a Mediterranean lower class. Nordic Phyrigians crossed into Asia Minor towards the end of the 13th Century B.C. and conquered the Hittites -who with the Kassites appear to have been a Mediterranean people ruled by a Nordic elite – and established the fabulous city of Troy. The roving Scythians were described by Ammianus (330-400 A.D.) as “almost all tall and handsome with hair almost yellow and a fierce look”; and the Cimmerians who raided across the Caucasus as early as 680 B.C. were Nordic also. As in the present age, Nordic was continually at war with Nordic, a baleful tribalism working to this effect then as a baleful nationalism has done over recent centuries, causing a great reduction in our precious Nordic blood to the great advantage of the more rapidly reproducing non-Nordic breeds.

In the vicinity of Sumeria, the Aryan-inspired civilization of Ancient Persia arose at a later date. The Nordic Persians entered what is today Iran about 900 B.C., followed by closely related Nordic Medes. The very name “Iran” derived from “Aryan”.In the 6th Century B.C.Persian society was still so clearly Nordic as to cause travellers to remark that the people were “nearly all fair and ruddy like Greeks”.In that period ruled King Darius the Great (521-485 B.C.) who declared “I am an Aryan, the son of an Aryan” and whose portrait sculpture bore this out, depicting a pure Nordic type. However the same old pattern of decline and submergence followed before long: the tall, blond, Persian ruling class mixed their blood with the dark people in racial suicide.


Ruling the known world at the age of 32, his empire encompassing two million square miles and his navy a thousand ships, was a handsome, fairhaired Nordic leader of a Nordic people: Alexander the Great of Macedon (356-323 B.C.). The people like the empire vanished through race mixture, an inadequate birth rate, and the lack of a creed for racial survival.

Yet another great civilization which attained its greatness through and only through its Aryan (Nordic) blood, and which fell because and only because that blood became diluted to submergence through race mixture, was that of Rome. About 1100 B.C. Nordics entered Italy as Umbrians, though there are indications of a previous Nordic influx from north of the Alps even as early as 2000 B.C. In the 9th Century B.C. came the Nordic Latins. Nordic creative capacity subsequently resulted in a finely ordered state endowed with bridges, aqueducts, sewers, public baths, theatres and temples, harbours and lighthouses and 50,000 miles of good roads across an empire embracing virtually the whole of the civilized world. As a significant racial indicator, the Roman deities such as Apollo, Bacchus, Diana, Jupiter, Mars, Mercury and Venus were shown in statues and sculptures as having unmistakable Nordic features, and were described as having blond hair. All the magnificence which originally was Rome’s came to an end with miscegenation. Rome’s oldest constitution had laid down classes founded on race: the Patricians, who composed the Roman Senate, corresponding to 300 families of the original Nordic conquerors, and the Plebians corresponding to the earlier, predominantly Mediterranean, conquered population which included Alpine, Dinaric and Hither Asiatic elements, and which had no political rights. A first great downward step came in 445 B.C. when a law was introduced allowing marriage between Patricians and Plebians.

Next, the importation of cheap grain from the orient ruined the sturdy yeomanry, as always a backbone for a healthy state, causing agricultural land to be gathered into the estates of wealthy plantation owners who brought in Africans and Asians as slaves from the colonies to work their plantations. With the enervating inevitability of such a process, Roman citizenship was eventually extended to freed slaves and to subject races throughout the empire. From this it was but one step further for the decadent Romans, where they had not come to regard having children as an interference with their freedom and pleasure, to find freedom and pleasure in mating with those of other races, the mongrel mob of which was in any event procreating plentifully. Thus did night fall on the Roman Empire, as it is now falling on the homeland of the once mighty British Empire.


Throughout those early times, Nordic peoples in their many differentiations and their pristine vigour were repeatedly astir in waves of migration, distinguished as phases of the Volkerwanderung (Folk Wandering), stimulated by climatic changes, expanding population and soil exhaustion. A first phase, which we have already noted, took place in the New Stone Age. A second phase can be distinguished as taking place at the end of the succeeding Bronze Age, which for Britain ended around 500 B.C., and which included further penetration by Germanic tribes westward along the North Sea and eastward along the Baltic. We now come to consider a third phase which involved the conflict between the Germanic peoples and the Roman Empire in its declining days.

It is in this third phase that the Celts come to our attention, and in so doing bring again to our attention the pitfalls of assuming a common race from a common or similar language which can so easily result simply from contact and conquest. Madison Grant, mentioned earlier as the author of that outstanding study of Nordic decline, “The Passing of the Great Race”, put the matter well when he said (Page 62): “To class together the Breton peasant with his round Alpine skull; the little, long skulled brunet Welshman of Mediterranean race, and the tall, blond, light eyed Scottish Highlander of pure Nordic blood, in a single group labelled Celtic is obviously impossible.”

The Celts, collectively so-called, migrated in two quite separate waves of two quite different peoples, racially. First came a wave of Nordics who entered France from Germany, dominated western Europe from about 900 B.C. to about 200 B.C., and spread to Britain about 800 B.C. They were responsible for the Erse language in Ireland, a land so-named as that of the Aryans because of the Nordic nature of those fair-haired Celtic immigrants; for the Manx language in the Isle of Man; and for the Gaelic language in Scotland where the antecedent inhabitants were Picts, apparently of Mediterranean stock

These Germanokelten were portrayed by early Greek writers as tall, fairskinned and blond-haired with blue or grey eyes. Virgil, the Roman poet of the First Century B.C. said of them: “Golden is their hair and golden their garb.” Boadicea, queen of the Iceni in resistance to the Roman occupation of Britain, was a golden-haired Germanokelten. Their skulls scarcely differed from those of the later Germanic immigrants to Britain, the AngloSaxons.

The second and ethnically quite different though linguistically akin people were the Gallokelten who came to Britain around 300100 B.C., and who were responsible for the ancient Cornish language, the Cymric language of Wales, and, on the Continent in Brittany, the Amorican language. These Gallokelten, centred on southern Gaul (the Roman province later going to form France), were Alpines.


The Goths, as one of the great divisions of the Germanic peoples of Aryan (Nordic) Race, have been slightly noticed earlier in their most ancient lineage and dispersion. Their name is derived from “Gut tones” or “Guthones”, another form of which is “Teutons”.Having previously based themselves in Sweden around the part accordingly named “Gotaland”, towards the end of the Second Century A.D. they began to move south-eastward into the more ancient Nordic homeland north of the Black Sea, and into other parts; the eastern-moving section becoming known as “Ostrogoths”, who towards the end of the Fifth Century A.D. conquered Italy; and the westernmoving section becoming known as “Visigoths” and conquering and settling in Spain and Portugal.

The aristocracy of Spain and Portugal, Visigothic in its ancestry, remained Nordic up to and during the period of imperial expansion of both these countries. Ferdinand, King of Aragon, and Isabella of Castile whom he married in 1469, thereby uniting Spain and founding its monarchy, were both depicted as red-headed Goths. The decline of both bhe Spanish and the Portuguese imperial power came with racial intermarriage diluting away the Nordic blood of the Visigoths. Recording this oft-repeated tragedy, the Ilth Edition of the “Encyclopedia Britannica” stated: “The Portuguese intermarried freely with their slaves and this infusion of alien blood profoundly modified the character and physique of the nation.”

Goths, along with their fellow Nordic Burgundians and Franks, settled in what became entitled “France” through the ascendancy of the kingdom of the last named. Their fellow Teutons, the Germanic Angles and Saxons and Jutes, invaded and settled in England to add their measure of Nordic blood to that previously present, and when this Germanic pattern of migration ended about 600 A.D., it was succeeded by that of the Nordic Vikings from Scandinavia who, between about 700 and 1100 A.D. ventured far and wide over the globe, settling in both Britain and France, later as Normans coming from Normandy in France to conquer England and her earlier Nordics.


Contradicting the well-rooted fallacy that only with Columbus was the “New World” discovered by Europeans in 1492, there is ample evidence of them visiting North, South and Central America long before that time. To cite one of numerous studies, “Norse Discoveries & Explorations in America 9821362” by Hjalmar R. Holand (Dover Publications, U.S.A., 1969), after the Viking Eric the Red discovered Greenland in 982, the Viking Leif Erikson ventured further west and discovered what he termed “Vinland” in 1003, and which would appear to be an area of North America extending down to Massachusetts or even further south-west. Norse remains at L’anse-aux-Meadow in Newfoundland have been confirmed by the Smithsonian Institute, and Prof. Robert Hall of Cornell University, U.S.A., has confirmed that a stone carved with runes discovered in Minnesota is genuinely Norse. Beyond this, there are indications that North America was visited by adventurous Nordics far earlier than this. An inscription in the vicinity of Toronto is said to date to the 17th Century B.C., recording a Scandinavian King, Woden-Lithi, sailing across the Atlantic and establishing a trading post there.

All over South and Central America there are folk memories and other evidence of Aryans (Nordics) visiting and civilizing long ago. Said Pierre Honore, “In Quest of the White God” (Hutchinson, 1963):“Ancient Indian legends tell us that at some point in the mists of prehistory White men with beards landed on the shores of the New World. They brought the Indians all their science, knowledge of engineering, laws and their higher level of civilization. These men became the White Gods of the Indian countries.” Fair-skinned and blue-eyed, to the Toltecs and Aztecs of Mexico they had as leader Quetzalcoatl, to the Maya of Central America Kukulcan, and to the Incas of South America Viracocha. The Toltecs, whose pyramids as those of the Maya are highly suggestive of a link with Egyptian civilization identified by Waddell as Nordic-inaugurated, numbered among them that at Cholula which is the largest in the world. The Maya were invested with a marvellous calendar which gave 3373 B.C. as the outset of civilization, a date almost identical with that for the accession of the first Sumerian king, Adam, ascertained by Waddell from the Sumerian king lists.

Prof. Jacques Mahieu, writer of a number of books on the subject, including “Der Weisse Konig von Ipir ” (Grabert-Verlag, Germany, 1978), suggested that Quetzalcoatl was a Viking who landed in 967 A.D., becoming king of the Toltecs whose tradition is that they had themselves arrived shortly before from the land of Olman (Ullman) in the north, “Ullman” being the original name of the leader the Indians dubbed “Quetzalcoatl”. Mahieu described Manko Kapak, founder of the empire of the Incas, as a leader of another Viking band, and Pizarro, Spanish conqueror of Peru, recording the persistence of Nordic blood at that time, wrote that “The ruling class in the Kingdom of Peru was fair-skinned with fair hair about the colour of ripe wheat.” The legends of the White Gods may, however, take in memories also of other and much earlier Nordic penetrations.

Here again it was the old, sad story of the dwindling or the dilution into submergence of the Nordic blood responsible for civilization, and with it the inevitable decay of that civilization. This terrible tragedy was yet again due to a deadly failure to procreate the Nordic stock, added to a deadly descent into miscegenation.


South America, whose climate in many parts causes rapacious jungle very rapidly to envelop and hide the relics of Nordic-inspired civilization, still has secrets galore to be unravelled. Perre Honore was confident that one day the enormous Amazonian jungle will reveal amazing signs of White civilization there. Anthropologists in 1971 discovered a tribe of white-skinned Indians in its depths. English explorer, Col. P.H. Fawcett, wrote in 1924 of also finding remote South American tribes with blue eyes and auburn hair, and an American explorer in 1968 discovered a dozen previously unknown and apparently pre-Inca cities in the jungles of northern Peru.

In Bolivia, at a height of i2,596 feet above sea level in what is now a barren wilderness, a short distance from Lake Titicaca (a name said by one authority to mean the “Lake of the White Gods”) stands the enigmatic ruins of a very ancient city, now known as Tiahuanaco. Evidence shows that it once had a harbour, although today it does not stand at the edge of any water. It was constructed of huge blocks of stone fitted together with amazing precision, and was most fortunately photographed and written about many years ago by Arthur Posnansky (“Tiahuanaco, The Cradle of American Man”) before so much of that stone was removed for building purposes elsewhere.

H.S. Bellamy in his “Built Before the Flood ” ( Faber & Faber, London, 1943) concluded that the climate must have been tropical in comparison to that there today. He referred to the folk memories of the local Indians that it was built when much more of the Inter-Andean Plain was a lake, and prior to a great cataclysm whereby a tremendous flood -occasioned by the aberrations of the moon according to Horbiger’s theory to which he subscribed – destroyed the people of the city. Thor Heyerdahl, the celebrated explorer who has described the huge statues of Easter Island, lying in the Pacific west of Chile, as having the physiognomy of White men who reached there from South America, concurred with Prof. Mahieu in the outcome of their common study of legends in attributing tremendous Tiahuanaco to civilizing White men.

Since the rise and fall of preceding civilizations touched on in preceding pages, a new and great civilization has arisen in modern times in Europe and spread imperially across the world, only yet again during the century now ending to suffer the same old trends of destruction, namely a falling birth rate of the Aryans coupled to their increasing interbreeding with other races, and accompanied by vast inter-Aryan slaughter in two world wars consuming especially the finest of procreative younger men. Just one wonderful and unprecedented attempt to halt and reverse the drift to ruin did take place, the National-Socialist one under Adolf Hitler, which came so very near to world triumph, only to be finally brought down by the foul forces representing that ruin.


With that catastrophe began the twilight world of today, dedicated to the most rapid transition possible to the dark night of Democracy distin-guished earlier on in these pages. The Vanguard, as custodian of remembrance of and reverence for our illustrious Aryan past, has to face and to fight that gigantic menace to our Folk. which we now turn to examine in some detail. It has to do so not in dejection at what we are up against, but instead in proud elation, being goaded into total war against it by the very magnitude of its challenge. This is the spirit expressed in the Old English poem, Beowulf, in the words “Better is death than life in shame.” To this may be aptly added the following distillation of the out – look of our Teutonic ancestors by a leading authority on their thought: “Honour has the reality of life, or soul, and therefore the bitterness of death is removed by a hope of resurrection in fame.”

The stark, overshadowing, horrifying fact of today is that we Whites are a direly threatened people. The Coloured people of the world, already vastly exceeding the White people numerically, are out breeding the latter most rapidly with the result that the latter will be reduced to a comparatively small minority within the immediate future, and will eventually disappear like that extinct bird, the dodo, or that extinct reptile, the dinosaur. Furthermore, the racial mainstay of the White people, namely those of Nordic or predominantly Nordic breed, are being more and more reduced in their ratio to the other Whites. This the Hamburger Abend Zeitung (Germany, 20 April 1988) reported on, stating that in England the percentage of blonds in the population had fallen from 65% in 1928 to 10% in 1988, presaging the passage of the Nordics to extinction within 130 years.


Taking note now of some details of this rise of the Coloureds and descent of the Whites, Australia and New Zealand were, up to the time of that great divide, the disastrous, anti-Aryan, Second World War, more Nordic than any other country except those of Scandinavia. Since that racial tragedy, however, the former has abandoned it s “White Australia policy in 1973, and subsequently has admitted Coloureds freely. It has even taken steps to boost its aborigines, racially so incapable as to have failed to advance beyond the stone age unaided, and with the result that depraved Whites have so copulated with these savages that a third or more of the savages are now half-breeds.

Australia’s revolting Minister for Foreign Affairs at the time, a Bill Hayden, was quoted in Asiaweek (19 August 1983) as providing an epitaph for his breed in the following words: “Australia is changing. We’re an anomaly as a European country in this part of the world. There’s already a large and growing Asian population in Australia and it is inevitable in my view that Australia will become a Eurasian country over the next century or two. Australian Asians and Europeans will marry one another and a new race will emerge. I happen to think that’s desirable.” Seemingly and sorrowfully no-one shot the swine.

Concerning New Zealand, in 1981 it was reported that the latest census had shown a rise of 50.2% in Polynesians other than Maoris, since the previous one in 1976; that the Chinese and Indian element in the population was also rapidly expanding; and that the European element was the slowest growing (New Zealand Herald, 18 November 1981). The mating of Whites with Maoris has long been common, most of the latter now having some European ancestry, and one demographer estimating that by this last decade of the century 23% of children born each year have at least one Maori parent.

Canada’s immigration has been, proportionate to the size of its population, the highest in the world, but with the British and other European element slumping to a small minority in recent decades. More than 100,000 Coloured immigrants a year have been arriving from Hong Kong, India, Jamaica and Vietnam, with the province of British Columbia alone taking some 11,000 Hong Kong Chinese in 1994 alone.


Europe’s birth rate, a sure barometer of the salubrity of its system, now stands at its lowest figure since records began 36 years ago, reported the London Daily Telegraph (2 December 1993). This is well below replacement level, which is a standstill situation requiring a fertility rate of 2.1 babies per female. Yet by 1986 the rate had come to stand at in Britain only 1.7, in France only a trifle higher, in West Germany only 1.3, and in Denmark and Sweden about the same. Between 1966 and 1974 the German birth rate – which had much increased under the National-Socialist regime through its measures of direct encouragement beyond the general effect of its ethos, plunged under demoralizing Democracy from 17.8 births per 1,000 people to 10.1, and now stands at a record low.

News just out is that a sperm-count survey of British males has shown a very severe slump in fertility further endangering the birth rate. This disturbing development mayor may not relate to the devitalized diet and damaged environment under cash-dominated Democracy. Rudolf Hess, setting the procreative tone of National-Socialism in contrast to the sterile, pleasure-and-profit craving of decadent Democracy, was reported in the Volkischer Beobachter (25 December 1939) as declaring: “The highest duty which a woman can do for the community is to contribute to the continuation of the nation through racially healthy children.” Nothing all the Clintons and Majors of this world have ever said or will ever say has come or will come remotely near the importance of this declaration.

In pursuit of this governing impulse of racial continuation, there were state loans to newly married couples of healthy German blood with no interest charged for a year after each birth, and 25% of the loan knocked off for each child born, and with coupons issued for the purchase of household goods. These benefits were funded through taxation of the unmarried, this arrangement providing a further encouragement to procreation. So that the children were properly cared for by the mother as her most valuable form of work, it was not only a condition of receipt of these benefits that the wife did not go out to work, but the all-round care for motherhood of the National-Socialist state removed the economic need for this deviation which is a feature of the child-renouncing and child-neglecting Democracy.

Honouring motherhood, the birthday of Hitler’s mother was made the “Day of the German Mother”, and in public ceremonies those attaining 4 or 5 children received a bronze “Mother’s Cross”.those attaining 6 or 7 a silver cross, and those attaining 8 or more a gold cross. Cross holders received numerous special allocations, allowances and other privileges.

The anti-racial, Christian stigmatizing of “illegitimacy” was replaced by the authorities with the racial criterion whereby no healthy child of good race could be regarded as “illegitimate”.Said Dr. Leonardo Conti, Minister of Health: “The Fuhrer welcomes every newborn citizen of the Reich whether or not its producers are in possession of a slip of paper called a marriage licence.” In this enlightened spirit the Lebensborn project took shape. Its primary purpose was to stop the abortion of healthy, racially valuable babies through the provision of special maternity homes for unwed or widowed, expectant mothers.

Returning, sadly, to today, while the White birth rate in Europe has become so suicidally low, Coloured immigration to Europe and the Coloured birth rate within Europe has soared. British readers are probably well enough aware of its magnitude in their country as not to need data here. Germany had by 1990 acquired 5.2 million foreign immigrants without citizenship, and this not counting the horde of asylum-seekers. Even Sweden’s 8 million inhabitants now include over a million not of Swedish origin. Portugal’s President, Mario Soares, in a statement in 1995, uttered the racial obscenity that “Portugal is honoured to have so many Africans here. It is our tradition. They are our brothers ” ( The Washington Times U.S.A., 19 June 1995).


The U.S.A.”s population record reveals to the full the tragedy of the persistent failure of the Aryans to practise racial self-defence. Prior to the last two decades of the last century, immigration was restricted to Northern Europeans from Britain, Germany and Scandinavia, so that a vast expanse of new territory with enormous resources was set to become something approaching a Nordic Utopia. The first point of departure from what could have been a real “American Dream” come true was in the final two decades of the last century when immigration from Southern Europe was allowed to set in and surpass, followed by the admission of a huge Jewish immigration and other non-Nordic immigration from Eastern Europe. The final stage of opening the door to all and sundry in spoliation of an idyllic prospect came in 1965 when a new law, put forward by the Jew Emmanuel Celler, allowed in immigrants from Asia, Africa and Latin America.

In consequence of Celler’s sabotage, by 1991, as revealed by the latest census to that date, the European stock in a then nation of 250 million had gone down to less than 77% with 62 million being mainly of Negro or Hispanic or American-Indian ancestry. Since then the ten top sources for legal immigration have become Mexico, the Phillipines, Korea, China and Taiwan, Vietnam, India, Jamaica, the Dominican Republic and Cuba; and an official of the Immigration & Naturalization Services has stated that even by the mid-1970s there could have been in addition 12 million illegal immigrants, more and more of whom daily come pouring over the border from Mexico.

The Population Reference Bureau was reported in the Tulsa World (10 october 1982) as estimating that Whites will be a minority in the the year 2080. The same south-western American newspaper reported (4 December 1992) Census Bureau predictions that during the next 60 years Blacks will increase from 32 million to 62 million, Hispanics from 24 million to 81 million, and Asians and Pacific Islanders from 9 million to 41 million. The White fertility rate is the lowest on record, and, symbolically, the very capital – Washington D.C. -is now three-quarters Negro. The American “melting pot” creed of Democracy displays itself today in its refuse-strewn, structurally and administratively decaying, drug infested and crime ravaged, mongrelized cities as the agency for the reduction of civilization to the rubbish heap. Britain and the rest of the Aryan world lags not so far behind in following suit.


Turning to the Coloured world proper, whose time seems to have come, China – now manifesting the mounting reality of “The Yellow Peril” of incipient anxieties of the past -reached a population of 1.2 billion last year (1995). India then had a population of 850 million, growing at a rate of 17 million a year, and estimated to reach a billion by the shortly approaching end of this century. Africa then was not far behind with 650 million. Mexico, with the highest birth rate in the world, is expected to reach 163 million by the year 2000; Africa 900 million, Pakistan 194 million, Indonesia 238 million, Bangladesh 209 million, Brazil 268 million, Philippines 102 million, Japan 132 million, Vietnam 101 million, Russia 346 million. once great, now little Britain is expected to have, immigrants and all, 56 million by the year 2000.

Putting figures together, United Nations experts in 1992 estimated that over the present decade the average annual rise in world population wil be 97 million, almost all of this in Africa, Asia and Latin America London ( Daily Telegraph 30 April 1992). Asia’s population as a whole and alone is expected to reach 4 billion by the year 2000.

Climatic changes, responsible in the past for major migrations as we have seen, were portended with similar consequences in a 800-page “Global 2000 Report” to the U.S. President, prepared by the U.S. State Department in 1980. It said that “major world climate changes are under way” whereby “starvation and famine could lead to social unrest and global migrations of populations”. Drought “could lead to the shifting of races. The moving of entire nations is possible with severe weather patterns.” ( The West Australian, 10 May 1976).

At aImost the same time, Algerian President Boumedienne predicted in 1974:“No quantity of atomic bombs would stem the tide of billions of human beings who some day will leave the poor southern parts of the world to erupt into the relatively accessible spaces of the richer northern hemisphere looking for survival. “

You cannot say you have not been warned. This can be “the final solution” of the Aryan problem for the rising and resentful Coloured world. Even now a current, authoritative estimate is that potentially there are 50 million “refugees” desiring access to White countries. Unless the Aryan miracle of resurgence, put forward in the Vanguard conception, comes about and soon, the Whites of the world are most certainly going to be overwhelmed by the sheer strength of the breeding numbers of the Coloureds of the world.


What is the Vanguard conceived to do in the face of this most appalling situation? To begin with, its members have to become adequately prepared for their gigantic task. This means becoming sufficiently knowledgeable racially, and thereby sufficiently alert and enthused racially. This in turn means studying systematically and fully the facts of racial differentiation; and getting further to know our Folk by thoroughly learning its history, including that considerable part preserved and embodied in folk legends and folk customs, and thus coming to cherish our racial heritage with unrelenting and unbeatable intensity. On top of that it also means learning the nature and extent of the menace to our Folk from the Coloured world and its influx into ours, and from the renegade, race mixers in our midst, identifying persons and practices, and from this learning our needs and devising our methods in meeting the menace.

Such preparation is the indispensable precondition for effective combative and remedial action. The pursuit of this condition of readiness is for the Vanguard, as a legion of doers, something far removed from both the studies of the armchair student and the desultory dabblings of the ordinary political person: people who are not doers but merely observers. The Vanguard even in this preparatory mode is a developing militia of the mind. After, and only after all such necessary preparation can this militia proceed to function effectively in active service for our Folk.

Through the requisite, racial insight thus gained the Vanguard will be led inevitably and emphatically to centre its thought decisively not on country or state above race, but on the race as a whole as a community. This places us in contrast to and in opposition to all those who differ from us on this, be they nationalists or fascists, whose top allegiance is to the state and its nation determined and circumscribed by geography, or all those Democrats who see residence alone, regardless of race, as determining nationality and the national community.

Democracy’s characteristic conception is that of any and every non-Aryan allowed to enter Britain becoming by virtue simply of residence here as British as our ancestral Aryan stock. This is an absurdity pernicious to the point of oscenity which the Vanguard utterly rejects. Instead, as a political starting pointe, it proclaims nationality to be rightly a matter of race.


Thinking positively with the blood, which is the definition of the real racialist required for the Vanguard, brings immediately within any country a sense of solidarity, a feeling of true kindness, arising from racial kinship within that country, which transcends all divisions other than those of race. It also excludes that unbridled individualism professed by the liberal lobby in Democracy which theoretically views man as something self-contained and separate from instead of inseparable from society. With our National-Socialism the only valid, human classification is one according to racial quality and usefulness to the racial community.

However, with our development of National-Socialism according to its inherent implications, its racial awareness, its sense of kinship, cannot logically stop there. It has to extend to the realization that this thinking with the blood must mean that the race as a whole, the dispersed and yet-to-coalesce Folk as a whole, transcends in turn the divisions of conventional and contemporary nations. It has to lead to the conclusion that conventional and contemporary nationalism is not enough, is not good enough, indeed has to be clearly and unequivocally rejected as harmful because of its divisive effect.

It has to result in the conviction that the greater nation must be seen as nothing less than the race as a whole. The higher nationalism of that Folk as a whole must be seen as supreme, deserving and commanding our higher allegiance. All other forms of nationalism are lesser, and only justifiable in so far as they are in accord with and subsidiary to that higher nationalism of the whole race. The arrival at this realization is the high mark of racial readiness for the struggle.


This great advance in thinking to the point of full Folkism has to be reached by the Vanguard as an absolutely necessary, revolutionary move matching and accompanying its other absolutely necessary, revolutionary move, already dealt with, of a religion related throughout to race. We cannot hope to win, unless we summon to our side the needed extra power to be derived from these two great, ideological advances. Anyone who cannot bring himself or herself to make the giant step forward in these respects cannot want victory enough to be fit for the Vanguard. It is as simple as that. This does not mean that we fancifully cease to see that the beginning of reformative action is at home in our own homeland, and that our own homeland and its native people are particularly dear to us by immediacy of attachment. What it does mean is that we abjure the myopic madness of petty nationalism which in putting soil before blood has brought our blood on our soil to the brink of extinction.

Instead of the continuation of inter-Aryan conflict we must have wholehearted acceptance of the fact that the survival and the revival and the welfare of any and every part of the Aryan Folk can only be found and must be sought in the survival and the revival and the welfare of the whole. Only if we accept wholeheartedly to stand together against the advancing Coloured world can we avoid falling together before its impact.

The nationalists who clamour for “national sovereignty” rightly point to the defects of the E.E.C., but mostly do so to the disregard of the fact that these defects are largely the intrinsic defects of Democracy present in all the member-states of the E.E.C., and simply reproduced in enlargement in the E. E.C.The “national sovereignty” of an ostensibly independent Britain which they make such a fuss about happens to be not the self – government of a truly free because racially liberated Britain but the spurious one of the sovereignty of the Jews in and over London instead of the sovereignty of the Jews in and over Brussels and the E.E.C.’s Continental domain, which is hardly a choice worth getting excited about. Against both such forms of thralldom, what we need and want is Racial Sovereignty.


Surely we have now seen enough of the way in which nationalism in more recent times and tribalism before then has wreaked ruin on the Aryans to the benefit of the non-Aryans? Surely it is by now incontestable that we just cannot afford to let it continue any longer if we are to have and to deserve the slightest chance of survival against those hordes of the dark peoples gathering at our gates to overwhelm us? A global problem with a global enemy stands before us. We can only deal with that problem and defeat that enemy if, understanding what it is all about, we respond as a united Aryan force with a united Aryan creed.

We cannot go it alone, and with any lesser perception. Even if, alone, we managed to gain power in Britain, since that power would not be part of a greater power beyond Britain, we would be crushed by other, retaliating segments of the world enemy. So to seek national sovereignty in separation and isolation from the rest of our racial kith and kin, the Folk as a whole, is to ensure failure for one and all.

What is here advocated is nothing other than a natural progression through racial awareness. The Aryan peoples divided and separated in the past, resulting eventually in the countries and nations of today, and there the process has halted so far, but without any logical finality to it. In place of the division and dispersal of the Aryan peoples we must now bring about a life-saving fusion, if we are to withstand the appalling peril we are in. Norwegian writer, Henrik Ibsen, voiced the vision when he said: “I view Scandinavian humanity as an intermediate stage toward a union of the entire, great Germanic tribe.”

This is not internationalism of the old Democratic order, which is inherently anti-Aryan. It is the supra-nationalism of Aryan unity in a new, National-Socialist order. We have come to the very last chance in the very last hour, and we will either come together in treating our race as a nation, or we will go down together into oblivion. Take your choice here: there is no other!

This process of Aryan coming together represents a departure from Democracy’s anti-racial notion of the bond of common “humanity”, and a return to the Teutonic notion of “frith”. This latter was defined by Vilhelm Gronbech in his brilliant 2-volume work, “The Culture of the Teutons” (English edition: Oxford University Press, 1931) as the sense of reciprocal support, issuing from the consciousness of kinship, which imbued our Teutonic or Gothic ancestors.

Quoting Gronbech (P. 172, Vol. 1):“In order to fill his place as a man, the Germanic individual must first of all be a kinsman. The morality, sense of right and sense of law that holds him in his place as a member of a state community, as one of a band of warriors, or a religious society is dependent upon his feelings as a kinsman; the greater his clannishness, the firmer will be his feeling of community, for his loyalty cannot be other than the sense of frith applied to a wider circle.”

Gronbech continued (P. 173):“Clan-feeling is the base of all spiritual life and the sole means of getting into touch with a larger world. The same power which makes the Germanic individual a kinsman prevents him from becoming a limited family being and nothing more. The strength and depth of frith and honour mould the clans together in alliances, and call larger communities into existence.”

Since the Vanguard is designed to be in practice no less than an anticipation in microcosm of the New Order of its beliefs, it follows that throughout it must reflect the return to and the refinement of frith. Hence it must be bedded in the principle that wherever in the world there stands someone of our Nordic Folk, or at least of our White races, and someone moreover of our ideology based on race, there stands a comrade; a comrade we have vastly more in common with and are far more bonded to than any other person of either our own or any other nationality, and of other views. The Nordic Briton who is a Democrat and anti-National-Socialist means nothing to us in comparison to comrades by both race and ideology. In the practice of this principle we have especially, as a fundamental point of honour, to care for our comrades wherever in the world they are imprisoned or otherwise suffer for our beliefs.


Since throughout earlier pages the Nordics have been particularly singled out and upheld, being still, if now only barely so, the biggest single constituent in the White population of Britain, and historically its predominant, formative force, let it now be made quite clear, following the call for racial unity just made, that we are here thinking and talkin~ of all the White races of the world, several of which and not just one are represented in Britain, and in a great part of her native inhabitants.

Within White solidarity as a whole there can be and should be comfortable room for a subordinate Nordic solidarity, along with subordinate solidarities for the other White races. Subordinate recognition does not in principle and must not in practice mean any divisive disparagement of one by another. Instead, it must be seen as the first level of an extensive, racial feeling, appreciation of a more immediate kinship being essential for the nurture of a feeling of kinship at a less immediate and secondary level; the natural progression to a perception of a bond between all the White races being through a perception of the bond between the fellow Nordics of those White races.


Members of the Vanguard, advancing in racial awareness to the necessary perception and pursuit of racial solidarity worldwide, will surely be led in their concern for the continuity of their Folk to mate not according to some blind, sexual impulse in the Democratic context of syrupy “love” as a mere pastime of pleasure, a recreation removed from racial purpose, and under the sole rule of king condom; but instead motivated by high respect for the Folk’s past and high obligation to the Folk’s future. In this purposeful frame of mind they will perforce be interested, as conducive to racial pride and resolution, to learn of their own lineage by genealogical investigation, and that of the prospective partner also, and in advance of consummation of the liaison; differing thus from the deracinated nomads of Democracy who lack any sense of racial roots in the past or racial stake in the future. Accordingly, they will only select as mate someone of Vanguard status also, matching the Nordic element of one partner to the Nordic element of the other, and so leading to the procreation of Nordic or predominantly Nordic children.

If and when the offspring arrive, the Vanguard parents should see in their most careful upbringing a great, personal contribution to Aryan civilization far surpassing the whole round of ordinary, political party activities over a lifetime with its endless solicitation of the approval of the stupefied dupes of Democracy, culminating in the wasteful folly of futile electioneering; a folly which will be dealt with in Part Six of this series. In the selection of a partner of equally high racial quality and ideologica.l commitment, and in the production and right rearing of children of high racial quality, members of the Vanguard will be performing a function of enormous importance which, moreover, can be accomplished here and now, and is not dependent on success in chasing that will-o’-the-wisp, the fantasy of ballot box victory. It follows from all of this that there cannot be any place at all in the Vanguard for homosexuals, being those who effectively say “no” to racial continuity.

An entirely non-Christian name-giving ceremony should be the racially meaningful start in life of every infant of Vanguard parents. Wilhelm Gronbech, referred to earlier, stressing the importance of the name-giving ceremony for our Teutonic or Gothic ancestors, pointed to indications of a time when the Folk life of the child was reckoned from the day when the father formally adopted the child by bestowing the name, thereby instilling frith, the spirit of kinship, in that child. Today, in a ceremony both simple and solemn, rendered holy by its significance, a two-fold confirmation should be enunciated: on the one hand the welcoming induction of the new member of the Folk is to be joyfully declared, and on the other hand there is also to be declared the parents’ promise to care for the child who is explicitly dedicated to the Folk. For added reverence, the naming and the parents’ pledge can well be performed in the ancient Gothic custom of oath-taking by extending the right hand, the weapon hand, to touch a ceremonial dagger, kept as the sacred symbol of home and family.

The following lines from a child’s name consecration ceremony in National-Socialist Germany captured the desired spirit of keeping troth (racial fidelity) which the name-giving ceremony of the Vanguard is intended to convey, and can be included in our contemporary ritual.
1) ” Thou art not today
and art not tomorrow
thou art 1,000 years before
thee and art 1,000 years
after thee
2) 1,000 years before thee
have guarded thy blood
that thou become just
what thou art
3) Guard thy blood, that
the generations that come
1,000 years after thee
have cause to than thee “

As to the actual forenames to be bestowed, it is imperative that Vanguard parents should testify to their and the child’s racial identity and purpose by bestowing Aryan (Nordic) ones. So away with all the Jewish ones adopted in servile veneration of the Hebrew Old Testament, namely John, Matthew, Mary, Ann, Hannah, Daniel, David, Michael, Elizabeth, Sarah, Samuel, Rachel, Susannah, Benjamin, Abraham and Deborah It is no way to start a future Aryan fighter off in life by inflicting a non-Aryan name on the child. That our own parents have been so misguided as to do it to us is no reason for us to re-impose the burden on another generation. Let us instead give old Celtic and Germanic/Teutonic/Gothic names some examples of which here follow. Celtic: Alan, Brian, Bridget, Donald, Duncan, Gwendolyn, Kenneth, Malcolm, Muriel, Neil, Owen, Una. Teutonic: Albert, Arnold, Baldwin, Carl, Gerald, Harold, Richard, Herbert, Robert, Edgar, Roger, Edmund, Raymond, Ralph, Alfred, Eric, Frederick, Edwin, Godwin, Caroline, Charlotte, Astrid, Audrey, Bertha, Edith, Matilda, Brunnhilda, Sigrun, Sigmund, Thora, Gudrun.

From this auspicious start, the Vanguard parents should ensure that the child is thoroughly educated and trained by them to become eventually part of the Vanguard. The child should be steeped in the wonderful story of our Folk, brought to see service to it as the overriding purpose of life, and armed to withstand all the influences of the schools and the outside world in general harmful to our Folk.

It is revolting to observe the great percentage of offspring of both nationalists and even ordinary National-Socialists, so-called, who are entirely reflective of Democratic degeneracy in their dress, addiction to jungle noise miscalled “music”, and their whole way of thinking and behaving. Their pathetic parents, forever prattling of what they will do for the nation when they are voted into state power, have proved utter failures at even bringing up their own children properly in that state in miniature which is the home, and over which they should be the rulers.

No less revolting are those parents of the nationalist and nominally National-Socialist organizations whose offsprings grow up encouraged and applauded by those parents to become simply and solely “successes” as players in the shekel-hunting arena of Democracy. The “success” of these castaways of the race is but the reward for their abject conformity to the values and habits of the death system, and the measure of their parents’ shameful neglect in effectively committing them to this alien bondage instead of to the cause of our Folk.


Brought to a state of readiness for the fight, the aristocrat of the Vanguard will daily demonstrate his or her worth by waging relentless racial war on all exponents of, campaigners for and conformists to racial mixture. All those in government, administration, commerce, industry, the churches and the media striving to promote racial mixture by exhortation or example or the exertion of pressure – including all imposed publicity and advertisement designed to familiarize favourably the presence of Coloureds and their association with Whites – are race criminals working for the death of our race, and thus deserving of the death penalty.

All those who fall in line with their diabolical endeavours, besmirching their ancestry and terminating their blood line by cohabiting with Coloureds and copulating with them and bringing forth mongrel offspring merit treatment as the foul renegades they are. All those who in lieu adopt Coloured children instead of either having children of their own or adopting Aryan children deserve and must receive similar treatment as outcasts.

All those who continually with the begging bowl solicit subsidies for the Coloureds abroad are in effect seeking to promote Coloured reproduction to our increased jeopardy through the donations obtained. Thus they have to be forcefully treated as the scum they truly are.

All of the evil teaching fraternity, engaged in the daily indoctrination of our children with the deadly poison of racial mixture, depriving our Folk of a whole generation, have to be fought against ceaselessly to the full. They must be made to feel the biting impact of our rightful fury.

This is the way of the warrior: taking the war to the enemy’s door. It is a way American prisoner of racial war, David Lane – associate of prototype vanguardian Robert Mathews who died gloriously fighting the enemy – has expressed in his definitive 14 words: “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children.” (Send a donation for David Lane’s literature to: 14 Word Press, HCOl -Box 268K, St. Maries, Idaho, 83861, U.S.A.)

There is even more to the matter of Race than the primary need to preserve the racial stock of the White peoples of the world, and especially for us the Nordic breed, and to this end to appreciate and implement the full implications and requirements of racial kinship. There is also the supplementary need to upgrade the racial stock by breeding measures of betterment, and this vital, eugenic aspect of Folk will be dealt with in the next part of “The Way Ahead”.

Part 3Part 5
Book Contents
Blog Contents


This entry was posted in Colin Jordan, History, National Socialism, Race and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s